The younger generation definitely shows much more maturity than the matured lot. They also demonstrate more commitment and responsibility towards work. Probably because they are not ready to accept the 'Chalta Hai' attitude and are constantly looking for the 'Change'.
And that is true not only in journalism or the corporate world, its true all across. We saw Milind Deora speak with much maturity on camera during the Mumbai crisis and we also saw RR Patil and now Achuthanandan passing most distasteful remarks. Will he ever realize that he had commented at a person who had just lost a brave son at a time when he needed him the most??? As least Mr Karat was quick to tender an apology sensing the under-current but the EGO of Mr CM Sir refuses to budge.
I really don't understand why these old jokers don't retire from work when all the other sectors (Govt., Public or Private sector) have retirement age. Even in Judiciary the retirement age of a Supreme Court Judge is 65 yrs. (But Rahul Bajaj once said "Only fools retire". God knows what he meant by that.)
I do agree that politics is very complex and a challenging task and not everybody's cup of tea. A successful corporate or an academician may not prove to be a wonderful politician. I also agree that experience do matter in the political arena. But I fail to accept that only the grand old men in politics can run the show.
The world order is fast changing. We have seen emergence of young dynamic leaders. Very recently US accepted Barak Obama over very experienced John McCain with thumping majority. We ourselves have seen a young PM in the past. We may have reservations in accepting his political capabilities but we did see a whole lot of IT revolution happen during that phase. Isn't it an irony that the oldest party in the country and its senior leaders, has to rely on two youngsters to bail them out in the upcoming elections?
Misguided young guns though are exceptions and detrimental to the general health of the nation … Raj Thakre has done immeasurable damage. But his exploits in the recent past coupled with the Mumbai carnage could have been the trigger that was required for the 'Aam aadmi' to get up and question the Govt. We did not react in such a manner even after a Kargil or numerous other occasions in the past.
In our discussions, I realise that we getting mixed up with the Role and Responsibilities of media with the 'Power of Media'. Someone had mentioned that they did an incredible work of keeping us informed by relaying the incident live, without taking an Ad break. An Ad in such a situation would have really looked out of place. When the whole country was in a state of shock and the whole world was watching this carnage…a chimpanzee popping out to promote an undergarment…or an insurance company promoting its new life insurance plan would have been a disaster.
We as professionals, who know the strength of media, can definitely contribute in bringing about some change in this basic 'Rotten System' that we exist in. We have seen President-elect Obama exploit this medium to the hilt. We have seen corporates rise and sink in the hands of bloggers. It can make or break reputations…so why should we not explore such medium for our advantage? A determined and sustained campaign will bring about desired result and has already started making the difference.
--Vineet Madhukar
From: dewaker basnet <dewaker.basnet@
To: prpoint@yahoogroups
Sent: Monday, December 1, 2008 20:09:33
Subject: Re: [prpoint] Let us salute the brave soldiers! Some more concerns on our TV media!!
Dear All,I live in London and it was really heart breaking to see what was happening in Mumbai. I was watching the live telecast from here, I really appreciate the coverage which kept many of us informed on whats happening. But also we need to remember that though the TV cable was disconnected inside the hotel, we were having live video's in the Internet too and hence need to be alert on whats being telecasted.The important point to note is many of the young journo were more professional than the experienced ones. I dont want to take any names (but ppl who watched will know whom I am speaking about), there was this well experienced jorno who was asking friend of a victim whether she thought when she met her friend before the incident that this was the last time she will be seeing her alive? Now what kind of question is this?Regards,Subha
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 1:58 PM, Induja Ragunathan <induja.v@gmail. com> wrote:
Dear AllThough one may agree that there were instances of immature reporting from the attackvenues by some reporters, i dont totally agree with all the accusation made against them.First of all we should realise that these situations new to many i.e. reporting attacks likeis new for us. I agree that there were blasts before and people have reported it but instanceslike this of live coverage for about 3 days continuously is all new to even television channels.Few journalists were initialy emotional becos i think they are people and how do u expectnot to react when a blast goes off when one is reporting. Comparing with BBC and CNN isalways been there but it is inside our country and people will react in some unexpectedcircumstances like this. But inspite there were excellent women journos who stayed there formore than 3 days and reported live without fear.We should also not forget that this continuous coverage has only caught people's attention all over india to forced them to be proactive and voice against politicians coming to the roads. Atleast this awareness is created and the whole credit should go to the channels only. Secondly about TRP i almost watched the entire live coverage even during nights and there was not even a single ad break in any of the channels which itself means they never generated monsy out of these coverages. It is only from today they have started to have their routine bulletins with regularsponsors.Lastly about the live action coverage, i do agree that initially they were showing operationof the NSG's which was later closed and infact senior journalist from all channels requested allchannels to avoid showing operational strategies and they openly said they did not disclose manyinformation they got out about NSG operation to its viewers. And showing visuals of commondosentering Taj, is nothing wrong which would deter their actions, all the actions was happening inside.Infact today in the NSG's chief press conference he thanked media for their co-operation for showingsome visuals like hostages waving hands for help from the room balconies and this lead the firemento go across to rescue them immediately. I should mention here that senior politicianswho are responsible for all these never even tried to be present in these venues until the end.Politicians including maharashtra deputy cm made immature remarks which what i think we should as communication persons should highlight more which will atleast lead to some changes in the society.On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 10:35 AM, Tyagaraj Sharma <tyag52@gmail. com> wrote:
The more one reads about the unfortunate developments in Mumbai( or
watches on TV) the more one gets a feeling of anger /frustration/ and
helplessness .While we all know that the politicians are to be blamed
for the mess,somewhere down the line one wonders about the security
that the top hotels in Mumbai had provided.
These issues apart,I agree with you,Srini,about the TV coverage.No
doubt that this was indeed a unique,even if tragic,event in India and
,therefore, lack of experience of the anchors and the electronic media
became more pronounced.The fact remains that while some channels like
NDTC /9x/UTVI showed restrain in their coverage, other went overboard
with the anchors shouting and screaming.Still others thought nothing
of showing the commandos/policemen trying to enter the Taj ,using
ropes to climb in.Somewhere down the line these channels lost all
perspective and became irresponsible.
Just a thought.We often watch the BBC and CNN.Look at their anchors
/newsreaders- -mature,greying but restrained with full control over
their emotions.Compare that with the ones we see on our channels.I
think we have to realise that experience and maturity is more
important than looks and age. Encourage to the youth is fine but
somewhere we have to draw the line--inexperience can be quite
dangerous in situations such as the coverage of the Mumbai blasts.
Tyagaraj Sharma
Journalist at Bangaloru
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 8:41 PM, Prime Point Srinivasan
<prpoint@gmail. com> wrote:
> dear friends
>
> Mumbai terrorist attack is coming to end. At this moment of my writing this
> post, official confirmation of death is yet to be received. Few brave
> soldiers, including senior officials of Mumbai have sacrificed their life
> for the Nation. Nearly 100 plus commandos, braving their life, faced the
> well trained and motivated terrorists for more than two days. They have
> done their job, in the presence of hundreds of cameras meticulously. They
> brought glory to the Indian Army and to the country. We salute them for
> their timely job at the time of National crisis.
>
> After taking possession of Nariman Bhavan, these bravemen, boarded their
> Military Van and left the place, amidst the cheeres of the people around.
> This was shown in all channels. If anyone had observed closely, they all
> left without any expression on their faces, with a great satisfaction of
> having done their job to the Nation. We may not remember the faces these
> 'unsung heroes', but we remember their brave act.
>
> I would like to share one important concern.
>
> Our Channels need to learn to handle the crisis situation with more care.
> These type of operations are highly sensitive and secretive. In their over
> enthusiasm of telecasting the news, and getting TRP rating, many channels
> were showing the minutest operations with zooming lens. Many rumours were
> floated creating panic amongst the Mumbai citizens. At one stage, Police
> authorities had to black out the channels. The channels rectfied the rumours
> later. Even Ministry of Information and Broadcasting had to summon the
> channel owners today and advise them to telecast in a responsible manner.
> Even the Secretary (Internal Security), had to appeal to all media not to
> telecast the operations 'minute to minute'.
>
> In one of the popular channels, the reporter was asking the Army Chief why
> even after one hour of Commandos entering the Hotel, nothing had happened.
> I donot know whether the reporter was aware of the seriousness of the
> situation. A person with common sense, can easily understand how can the
> army men can clear the terrorists within one hour. Or whether the channel
> expects the operations to be done in the presence of camera?
>
> A time has come that we need to think of our television reporting at the
> time of crisis. The importance is given more for sensationalising the
> event. I still remember how the TV Channels behaved during 9/11 in US.
>
> There is no absolute freedom for anybody in India, including media. The
> Indian constitution provides freedom for everybody uniformly. Freedom comes
> with responsibility. There is a limitation for our freedom. As used to be
> said, 'my freedom ends when other's nose begins'.
>
> Television channels need to understand that 'security of the Nation' is more
> important than their 'TRP ratings'
>
> I invite views
>
> srinivasan
> prime point
> 94440 50273
>
>
>
--
R.Induja,
Director, Projects (Chennai)
Masscomm Pr Ltd
Ph: 9444525343
--
http://www.linkedin .com/pub/ 9/188/b7
Get your new Email address!
Grab the Email name you've always wanted before someone else does!
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
__,_._,___
No comments:
Post a Comment