Dear Mr Srinivasan, I am reminded of a story, probably, by RK Narayan, wherein, a clerk on the day of his retirement, returning home, picksup a stone and hurls at the street lamp. The clerk had felt that the street lamp made mockery at him for several years as he was never allowed to go home before sunset, during his service. He was waiting to take revenge on the street lamp and he could satiate his desire by breaking it. Pentup desires and frustration are likely to drive any body to any direction. A terrorist or an extremist or a Naxalite, indoctrination apart, is a victim of frustration first. After all, the journalist who hurled a shoe on the Union Home Minister is a human being, an element in the society. As an individual, he could not resist his anguish. More insulting than hurling the shoe by the Journalist, is the action-replay of the shoe passing by the Minister, hundreds of times by every channel. And the penal provisions in Law for hurling a shoe on a party functionary are not that serious & specific, because it is neither an attempt to cause bodily hurt nor is it done to a dignitray guest to India as opined by a former Solicitor General. This incident calls for amendments to existing laws dealing with defamation - insult, libel, slander, vilification and the like. By the way, the reaction of Mr Chindambaram was cool and composed and appreciable. Regards, Y. Babji National Vice President (Admn) Global Forum for Public Relations --- On Tue, 4/7/09, s krish <krishalpha@yahoo. From: s krish <krishalpha@yahoo. |
__._,_.___
Please visit http://www.prpoint.com (for useful PR resource materials) and http://www.primepointfoundation.org (non profit trust for promotion of PR)and http://www.imageaudit.com (about Image Audit)and http://www.indiavision2020.org (on India Vision)
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
.
__,_._,___


No comments:
Post a Comment