Dear All We have all been discussing about the shoe-throw incident, ethics journalist should follw… Let's look at the other side of the story… Do you know how many journalist are humiliated by politicians How many journalist have lost jobs coz they wrote bad about politicians …Please don't think that politicians treat media with dignity all the time. Top politicians get irritated when they get to hear uncomfortable questions. Next step they take is ring up the editors office and see to it that journo gets good treatment for asking such questions. I had a talk with a senior journalist in Chennai, he gave instance after instance. He said all the incident goes unnoticed. I feel Journalist don't have any freedom to raise critical question or write anything that's critical for the mass. Best regards Narren
--- On Thu, 4/9/09, Prime Point Srinivasan <prpoint@gmail.com> wrote:
From: Prime Point Srinivasan <prpoint@gmail.com>
Subject: [prpoint] Shoecast - Analysing 'Protest Communication' and provocation
To: "Prpoint Group" <prpoint@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Thursday, April 9, 2009, 11:21 AM
dear friends
The discussion on the shoe incident (thought of coining a new word Shoecast like broadcast, podcast) brought out various angles and dimensions. On the one hand, it is argued that no journalist should bring in his personal emotions to the forums like the press conference. It is also argued that journalists should show his neutrality.
On the other hand, it is also argued that journalists are also human beings and when the emotions exceed their tolerance level, such things happen. If an ordinary citizen has shown the protest like this, he would have been put under 'Goondas Act'. Since, the protest was shown by a journalist, the Government could not do any thing, for fear of backlash. It is also argued that none of the media houses will be interested to take the public issues and public sentiments very seriously, for many reasons, including commercial reasons. In that case, it is argued, a emotionally charged reporter would react only like this.
On analysing both sides of the incident, when the Government Authorities behave in an arrogant manner, how the people would protest? How the protest can be exhibited without being branded as 'Goonda'?
I discussed this issue with one of the retired IAS officers, who held very high positions in the Central Government. He did not want to be identfied. He said that many times Government Authorities show scant respect to the Constituional positions and even they do not respect the consensus. The power of arrogance blinds their eyes. He quoted for example, inspite of all controversies, Pratibha Patil was put up as a Presidential candidate. Inspite of all controversies, Navin Chawla was made as CEC. Though many consensus candidates were avaiable then, Government was not willing to consider. Now, against the Sikh sentiments, Sajjan Kumar and Jagadish Tytler were given tickets and given clean chit hurriedly, particularly during election time. . He went on to say that such acts, arising out of " what-can-you- do" attitude, irk large number of silent majority. This leads to frustration and people look for some ways to ventilate the anger.
According to the retired senior official, such incidents are not avoidable from the common man. Irked by the arrogant attitude of Government, Jarnail Singh used the opportunity to show his protest. Jarnail Singh did not target the Minister, but protested by throwing the shoe to a nearby open space. The retired senior bureaucrat was asking a question, when the Government itself was not worried about the ethics, values of the constitutional bodies, where was the question of talking about the professional ethics of a journalist. He wanted the Government Authorities to learn a lesson out of this incident.
I request members to share the views. I think, we need to start thinking about 'protest communication'
Srinivasan
Moderator
|
No comments:
Post a Comment