Tushar
Buddy it is unfortunate that rather than having an open mind and looking at what needs to be done you turn around and question a REAL EXPERIENCE. That to me is one of the problems - not willing to listen with a open mind. When I posted this comment I was almost expecting this reaction.
This is not about Client vs PR agency , it is about a narrow focus on 'Media Relations' and lack of 'talent' ,'training for talent' and 'inability to attract the best talent.' My experience is a customer will pay for the 'value' delivered and If clients do not 'value' PR in India as you suggest - who is to blame ? If clients are demands are absurd and if PR agencies are accepting them who is to blame ?
I do agree that we do have the ability to match the best globally and I also agree that it calls for investments in the most important resource for an agency 'its people' and for that clients would need to pay. But who is going to take the charge?
Are customers willing to listen to strategic counsel - you bet they are , we today compete in a global marketplace and are getting exposed to global best practices.I do agree thet the US and UK PR agencies have a lead of time over us , yet we have an advantage we need not commit the mistakes that they did and learn some of the best practices and create some of our own. I am sure those with an open mind would be willing to learn and take up the challange of benchmarking against the 'global best' as I do know a few are already doing.
Sanjay Mudnaney
To: prpoint@yahoogroups
From: tushpin@yahoo.
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 11:51:38 +0530
Subject: Re: [prpoint] Another debate - How do we compare on global benchmarks?
From: Sanjay <sanjaym@mastek.
To: prpoint@yahoogroups
Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 5:10:49 PM
Subject: [prpoint] Another debate - How do we compare on global benchmarks?
We recently engaged with a leading PR agency in the US and the experience has been an eyeopener. They are far ahead of what I have ever experienced. The quality of talent and the understanding of 360 degree PR is far ahead of my experience here. The 'strategic' approach to PR rather than a pure 'media relations' approach is so very clear in each and every touch point of experience that I have had. The reporting , the proactive counsel, domain understanding is far superior.
The problem I guess is the quality of talent and that may be linked to the kind of investments that are made to train fresh talent.Perhaps also we do not get the best to join this field.
Sanjay Mudnaney
Date India's Teen Diva. Find out if you hit it off with her or are her fiery opposite. Drag n' drop
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe


No comments:
Post a Comment