Hi,
I concur with the points brought out by Rajiv Arvind.
Yet, I wish to reiterate a couple of points of my view.
If you will recollect what I wrote in my introduction to the debate - what was
1) the company's and
2) the ad agency's
objective of that ad.
For the company, if the objective is to translate the ad and eyeballs to sales, would the attention, debate and references translate to firmed-up sales? I am skeptical about it.
As for the ad agency, if the objective was to catch eyeballs and attention, yes, they have been successful. And there lies the case.
It is the responsibility of the company to assess whether the ad will help its bottom line in anyway.
Nothing wrong with bikini-clad girls. She is fine by herself. The point of contention is - what is its relevance to the message and what is being communicated by it.
Rgds,
Susan
To: prpoint@yahoogroups
From: rajivarvind@
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 09:44:29 +0530
Subject: [prpoint] Re: Debate: What is the purpose of advts.? eyeballs or message about the brand
All the latest on four wheels and more Get it now.


No comments:
Post a Comment